I finally got around to watching this film: A story of someone who wrecked herself because she wanted to fill something that couldn’t be filled. Not by music, not by the scene, not by the drugs, not even by her own beauty. Someone who was running from the silence in her head and the boredom of being — deep down — ordinary. She had looks, charisma, but she always needed more: more attention, more chaos, more validation. And when she got it, it wasn’t enough. You watch this film and you constantly feel the gap between what she thought life owed her and what it gave her. And that gap ate her alive. I suppose she needed someone to tell her she was enough, as she was, without all the destruction. But she didn’t believe that anyone really thought that — not her man Keith Richards, not anyone. She made herself bigger than life because that’s what she thought life demanded from her. But no one can live that big forever.

​

For almost a decade she represented the allure of a life lived on the edge, but it often obscured the harsher realities — the consequences of choices made in the name of freedom, creativity, rebellion, but often only in the name. She came from a world of European bohemian sophistication, where appearances mattered and depth was assumed. And yet she chose to immerse herself in a chaotic, rebellious scene where appearances were loud, and depth was optional.

 

The counterculture promised liberation, but it often delivered chaos. Her life was intertwined with the hedonism of the Stones, a band whose mythology revolved around their ability to consume and survive — but not without leaving scars on themselves and those closest to them. Relationships fractured, loyalties wavered, and the pursuit of freedom frequently gave way to disillusionment.

​

Her children were born into this volatile environment, where the lines between love and neglect, stability and upheaval, were often blurred. She, like many of her contemporaries, couldn’t reconcile what she needed with what she wanted — to control and to be seen, fully seen. She loved power — not in the way people think of it, but the power to influence, to create ripples. But she never felt she had power over herself.

​

To romanticize Pallenberg’s life is to overlook the realities she faced and the impact of her choices. Her story, like that of many figures from the countercultural movement, is a cautionary tale as much as it is a reflection of the times. The freedom she and her peers sought was intoxicating, but it often came without a roadmap for navigating the consequences. The counterculture was often guilty of mistaking license for freedom and the dismantling of old structures did not always lead to the creation of new, more equitable ones. 

​

The truth of her life lies in its contradictions: the beauty and the ruin, the inspiration and the fallout. She was not a heroine, nor a villain, but a human being caught in the currents of a tumultuous era. Her legacy is a reminder that freedom is never free and that the pursuit of a life unbound by convention often demands a terrible price. What drove her, in the end, might have been fear — fear of irrelevance, fear of being ordinary. She wanted to escape mediocrity, but the paths she chose to do that… they cost her.